Have you ever wondered why dentists sometimes save a tooth and other times remove it completely? The distinction lies in how each procedure treats the problem. Understanding these differences helps patients make informed decisions about their oral health.
A root canal is designed to save a tooth that has become infected or severely decayed. During the procedure, the dentist removes the inflamed pulp from the tooth, cleans the canals, fills them with a biocompatible material, and seals the area. A dental crown is often placed on top for strength and function.
This treatment allows patients to retain their natural tooth structure, maintain bite alignment, and prevent jawbone deterioration. According to the Canadian Dental Association (CDA), root canals have a success rate exceeding 90% when properly maintained.
In contrast, a tooth extraction involves removing the entire tooth from its socket. This is often necessary when the tooth is too damaged to restore — for instance, when decay extends deep below the gum line or when a severe fracture has occurred. After extraction, replacement options such as implants, bridges, or dentures may be considered.
Recovery from a root canal typically takes 2–3 days, with minor discomfort manageable through over-the-counter pain relief. An extraction, however, can take up to two weeks, particularly for complex cases or molars.
Cost-wise, a root canal with a crown can range from CAD $800 to $1,800, depending on the tooth and thematerials used. Extractions are generally cheaper upfront (CAD $150–$400), but missing teeth may lead to alignment issues or bone loss, increasing long-term costs.
| Procedure | Main Purpose | Average Cost (CAD) | Recovery Time | Long-Term Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Root Canal | Saves natural tooth | 800–1,800 (with crown) | 2–3 days | Maintains jawbone and bite alignment |
| Tooth Extraction | Removes the tooth completely | 150–400 | Up to 2 weeks | May cause bone loss or shifting of nearby teeth |
Dentists recommend root canals when the infection is confined within the tooth, and the outer structure remains strong. Extractions, however, are chosen when the damage or infection is so extensive that the tooth cannot be restored safely.
As Dr. Amir Guorgui, BSC, DMD, MACSD, explains: “Preserving a natural tooth, whenever possible, is always our first priority. A root canal often provides a reliable way to maintain both function and aesthetics without resorting to tooth removal.”
When it comes to molars, the decision becomes even more complex. These teeth are essential for chewing, and their deep roots make treatment choices highly case-specific.
Dentists use several diagnostic tools before making a recommendation:
According to Dr. Rob Eisen, DDS, a leading practitioner at Mapleridge Dentistry, “Every decision balances the tooth’s current condition against long-term stability. We look beyond just the x-ray — we assess the entire oral ecosystem.”
In more advanced cases, a cone beam CT scan may be used to evaluate bone density or detect hidden fractures. This advanced imaging helps determine whether root canal therapy remains feasible or if extraction is the safer route.
| Assessment Criteria | Root Canal Recommended | Extraction Recommended |
|---|---|---|
| Infection confined to pulp | ✓ | |
| Severe bone loss | ✓ | |
| Tooth structurally sound | ✓ | |
| Vertical root fracture | ✓ | |
| Pain is manageable with endodontic therapy | ✓ | |
| Recurrent abscess despite prior treatment | ✓ |
Sometimes, patient preference or medical history influences the choice. For example, individuals with certain systemic conditions (like uncontrolled diabetes or heart disease) may benefit from preserving the tooth to reduce surgical risks. Conversely, if a patient cannot afford follow-up care or crown placement, extraction might be the more practical solution.

Not always — but often, yes. While root canals are preferred for maintaining function, there are cases where extraction is the healthier option.
Studies published in the Journal of Endodontics show that teeth treated with root canals can last 10–15 years, sometimes for life, when properly restored. Extractions, however, may lead to bone resorption and bite misalignment unless replaced with implants.
| Factor | Root Canal | Tooth Extraction |
|---|---|---|
| Pain During Procedure | Minimal (local anesthesia) | Mild to moderate |
| Recovery Discomfort | Short-term | Moderate to significant |
| Long-Term Cost | Moderate | Higher if replacement is needed |
| Jawbone Preservation | Maintained | Lost over time |
| Aesthetic Result | Natural tooth retained | Requires artificial replacement |
Deciding between a root canal and an extraction is not a one-size-fits-all situation. It depends on tooth structure, bone quality, infection severity, and the patient's overall health. The best approach is a comprehensive evaluation with your dentist, supported by X-rays and professional consultation.
For more details or to schedule a consultation, visit Mapleridge Dentistry to learn how their team can guide you toward the treatment that best suits your smile.
Every dental decision comes with trade-offs, and choosing between a root canal and tooth extraction is no exception. Patients often weigh pain, cost, and long-term outcomes to determine which option is best for their oral health. Below is a concise breakdown to help clarify the differences.
Root Canal – Pros:
Root Canal – Cons:
Tooth Extraction – Pros:
Tooth Extraction – Cons:
| Factor | Root Canal | Tooth Extraction |
|---|---|---|
| Pain During Procedure | Minimal (local anesthesia) | Mild–moderate |
| Healing Time | 2–3 days | 1–2 weeks |
| Upfront Cost (CAD) | 800–1,800 | 150–400 |
| Long-Term Cost | Moderate | Higher if replacement is needed |
| Aesthetic Outcome | Preserves natural look | May need replacement |
| Future Oral Health | Prevents bone loss | Bone resorption possible |
Pain is one of the biggest concerns patients express when faced with either procedure. Let’s clear up the confusion: with modern anesthesia and advanced dental tools, both treatments are designed to be virtually pain-free.
A root canal typically involves local anesthesia, which completely numbs the tooth and surrounding tissues. Patients often feel only mild pressure, similar to getting a filling. A tooth extraction, however, can sometimes involve more manipulation, especially for molars or impacted teeth, leading to slightly more post-operative soreness.
Dr. Amir Guorgui, BSC, DMD, MACSD, explains: “In most cases, patients report that a root canal feels no different than a filling. The idea that it’s painful is outdated. Proper anesthesia makes the experience very comfortable.”
| Aspect | Root Canal | Tooth Extraction |
|---|---|---|
| Anesthesia Use | Local (complete numbness) | Local or sedation |
| Pain After Treatment | Mild, short-lived | Moderate, lasts several days |
| Return to Normal Eating | Within 1–2 days | 5–7 days |
| Follow-Up Care | Crown placement | Wound care and potential implant |

Despite advances in restorative dentistry, there are cases where extraction is unavoidable. When structural integrity or infection severity exceeds what a root canal can fix, removal becomes the safest course of action.
While root canals are typically the preferred choice for saving a tooth, extraction remains essential in severe cases. The key is timely diagnosis. The sooner an infection or fracture is detected, the higher the chance of saving your natural tooth.
For trusted evaluation and treatment options, visit Mapleridge Dentistry and schedule a consultation with their experienced dental team.
When evaluating dental treatment options, cost plays a major role in decision-making. While a tooth extraction may seem cheaper initially, factoring in replacement costs, such as implants or bridges, often changes the picture.
Root Canal (with Crown):
Extraction with Replacement:
| Treatment Type | Upfront Cost (CAD) | Replacement Cost | Insurance Coverage | Long-Term Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Root Canal + Crown | 1,700–3,300 | Minimal | 50–80% | Preserves natural tooth, long-lasting |
| Extraction Only | 150–400 | — | 70–100% | Low cost, but leads to bone loss |
| Extraction + Implant | 3,150–5,400 | — | 0–50% (varies by plan) | Excellent durability but costly |
| Extraction + Bridge | 1,950–3,400 | — | 50–80% | Functional, but affects adjacent teeth |
It’s tempting to wait when dental pain comes and goes — but delaying treatment can lead to more severe and costly problems.
Dr. Rob Eisen, DDS, emphasizes: “Delaying treatment is one of the biggest mistakes patients make. Infections don’t heal themselves — they get worse. Acting early can mean saving the tooth instead of losing it.”
| Risk Type | Likelihood with Delay | Potential Consequences |
|---|---|---|
| Infection Spread | High | Bone loss, abscess, systemic illness |
| Nerve Damage | Moderate–High | Loss of tooth sensitivity, extraction needed |
| Structural Failure | High | Tooth fractures, loss of chewing function |
| Increased Cost | Very High | Need for implants or bridges |
Recognizing symptoms early can make all the difference between saving your tooth and losing it. Dentists rely on a combination of symptoms, imaging, and nerve tests to determine the right treatment.
Modern diagnostics use digital X-rays and thermal testing to assess pulp vitality. Dentists may also perform percussion tests (tapping the tooth) or use CBCT scans to evaluate bone and root integrity.
| Symptom or Test | Indicates Root Canal Need | Indicates Extraction Need |
|---|---|---|
| Deep, persistent pain | ✓ | |
| Tooth mobility or bone loss | ✓ | |
| Abscess on X-ray | ✓ | ✓ (if extensive) |
| Fracture above the gum line | ✓ | |
| Fracture below the gum line | ✓ | |
| Nerve death (no response to thermal test) | ✓ |
For a comprehensive examination and personalized diagnosis, schedule a visit with Mapleridge Dentistry. Their experienced team will help you choose the most effective and comfortable solution for your smile.
While root canals and extractions are the most common solutions for treating severe tooth decay or infection, emerging dental technologies are opening the door to less invasive alternatives. These treatments focus on preserving natural tooth structure and preventing full pulp involvement.
A partial pulpotomy is a procedure in which only the infected portion of the dental pulp is removed, leaving the healthy portion intact. It’s typically performed on younger patients where the pulp can still regenerate.
Advantages:
Limitations:
This method involves applying a biocompatible material, such as calcium hydroxide or MTA (mineral trioxide aggregate), over an exposed or nearly exposed pulp to stimulate healing and dentin formation.
Advantages:
Limitations:
Remineralization uses fluoride varnishes, hydroxyapatite, and nano-calcium phosphate agents to rebuild weakened enamel. While this does not treat pulp infection, it can halt decay progression and prevent the need for more invasive procedures.
Advantages:
Limitations:
An emerging field, regenerative endodontics, aims to regrow dental pulp tissue using stem cells and bioactive scaffolds. This therapy is still largely experimental but shows promising results.
| Alternative | Ideal Candidates | Advantages | Limitations | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Partial Pulpotomy | Young patients, shallow decay | Preserves pulp vitality | Risk of reinfection | Moderate |
| Pulp Capping | Early decay, no pulp exposure | Non-invasive, preventive | Success depends on pulp health | Common |
| Remineralization Therapy | Early enamel lesions | Strengthens enamel | Ineffective for deep decay | Widely available |
| Regenerative Endodontics | Select research cases | Potential pulp regrowth | Experimental | Limited |

Choosing between a root canal, extraction, or alternative treatment depends on several factors — extent of decay, tooth structure, cost considerations, and long-term oral health goals.
| Factor | Root Canal | Extraction | Alternative Treatments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pain & Recovery | Minimal, 2–3 days | Moderate, up to 2 weeks | Minimal |
| Cost (CAD) | 1,000–3,000 | 150–400 (+ replacement) | 200–800 |
| Longevity | 10–20 years (with crown) | Permanent removal | Variable |
| Aesthetics | Preserves natural look | May require prosthetic | Preserves appearance |
| Insurance Coverage | 50–80% | 70–100% | Varies |
Whether you’re facing infection, decay, or uncertainty about treatment, timely consultation is crucial. Delaying care can turn a minor issue into a major one. For expert evaluation and personalized guidance, visit Mapleridge Dentistry to explore the best solution for your smile and long-term oral health.
When the pulp is infected, but the tooth structure is still healthy enough to be restored.
If decay, infection, or fractures make saving the tooth impossible.
No — both are pain-free with anesthesia. Root canal recovery is usually faster.
Root canals cost more upfront, but often save money in the long term compared to extraction with replacement.
Yes — partial pulpotomy, pulp capping, and regenerative endodontics may work in select cases.
No. Waiting can worsen the infection and make saving the tooth impossible.